[108] The Civil Engineers and Builders Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited Ravi Bhagat, IAS and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] claim of the petitioner was adjudicated upon by dated 13.03.2025. Copy thereof has been produced in Court same is taken on record. opposite. [2] not to attend the office of the respondent(s) to collect respondents were [3] contempt petition is IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1835 Date of Decision : The Civil Engineers and Builders Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited versus Ravi Bhagat, IAS and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Chirag Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel brings to the notice of this Court that the claim of the petitioner was adjudicated upon by .03.2025. Copy thereof has been produced in Court same is taken on record. Copy of the same stands He further submits that despite calling the petitioner, not to attend the office of the respondent(s) to collect respondents were constrained to send his cheque In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the contempt petition is disposed off. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1835-2025 Date of Decision : 09.04.2025 The Civil Engineers and Builders Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab Learned State Counsel brings to the notice of this Court that the claim of the petitioner was adjudicated upon by passing a speaking order .03.2025. Copy thereof has been produced in Court today. The of the same stands supplied to the counsel that despite calling the petitioner, he opted not to attend the office of the respondent(s) to collect its cheque. T constrained to send his cheque by way of registered post. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the Learned State Counsel brings to the notice of this Court that the speaking order The supplied to the counsel opted The post. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.22 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-1835 [4] Rs.23,000/ prays for liberty to avail remedy [5] 09.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma' 1835-2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that a Rs.23,000/- has been granted despite there being a claim of Rs.24 lacs. He prays for liberty to avail remedy against order dated 13.03.2025. Allowed, as prayed for. 09.04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- Counsel for the petitioner submits that a meagre sum of has been granted despite there being a claim of Rs.24 lacs. He order dated 13.03.2025. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No sum of has been granted despite there being a claim of Rs.24 lacs. He RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.22 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document