APHC010306722019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) T. Q TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14539 OF 2019 Between: Sanapala M.M.M. Krishila, S/o Late Seetharamayya, Hindu, aged 45 residing at D.no.39-16-54, Flat No. Visakhapatnam-530007. years, G-2, Bangaramma Residency, ...Petitioners AND 1. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home Department Department) Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Police Commissionarate, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002. 3. The Station House Officer, 5th Town Police Station (Law and Order), Kancharapaiem, Visakhapatnam-530007. 4. V Nageswara Rao, S/o. Venkata Rao, Hindu, aged 58 years, R/at D.No. 39-8-77/2, Muralinagar, Visakhapatnam-530007. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction morel in the nature of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station at the instance of the 4th respondent and directing him to settle out the dispute with 4th respondent by interfering in the civil disputes, as being illegal, arbitrary and Is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 not interfere with the dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent herein by forcible dispossession or otherwise. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent, and 3rd respondent by calling to the police station or otherwise, pending disposal of the above Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI The Court made the following order: APHC010306722019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14539/2019 Between: 1.SANAPALA M.M.M. KRISHILA, S/0 LATE SEETHARAMAYYA, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.39-16-54, FLAT NO. G-2, BANGARAMMA RESIDENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM-530007. 2.SRINU BABU GUDIVADA,, S/O.DEMUDU, AGED-36, OCCUPATION- UNEMPLOYEE BODAPALEM VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DT-531117 REF ID- 30144224 BC-B HALL TICKET- 18031250004412 SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL STUDIES)-RANK-21 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, 0/0 THE POLICE MAHARANIPETA, COMMISSIONARATE, VISAKHAPATNAM-530002. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 5TH TOWN POLICE STATION (LAW AND ORDER), KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530007. 2 4.V NAGESWARA RAO, S/0. VENKATA RAO, HINDU AGED 58 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 39-8-77/2, MURALINAGAR VISAKHAPATNAM-530007. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order direction morel in the nature of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station at the instance of the or 4th respondent and directing him to settle out the dispute with 4th respondent by interfering in the civil disputes, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 not interfere with the dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent herein by forcible dispossession or otherwise, and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent, and 3rd respondent by calling to the police station or otherwise, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.SIMHACHALAM KARUKCLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FCR HCME(AP) 2. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI 4 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14539 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Simhachalam Karukola, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court, to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs; Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA GIStRAR SECVION OFFICER assista,mt //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri Simhachalam Karukola, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri Devi Prasad Mangalapuri, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies TF \ HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 \ ORDER WPNO. 14539 OF 2019 Si 31 OCT 2025 m ★\Cufrent iiection^^ COSTS^"^^ WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT