111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SOHAN SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Anil Bidhan, Advocate for Mr. Arun Chander Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. HARKESH MANUJA, By way of present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023, prayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.701 dated 15.07.2023 (Annexure P registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Govind Chauhan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of complainant respondent No.2 4. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has stated at the Bar in question is quashed against the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, since t dispute so as to live in peace in fu served by proceeding further with the criminal proceedings. In the light IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: April 11, 2025 SOHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Anil Bidhan, Advocate for Mr. Arun Chander Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS rayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.701 dated 15.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 279, 336 and 427 of IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Govind Chauhan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of complainant respondent No.2. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has stated at the Bar that the complainant has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed against the petitioner. In view of the above, since the parties having settled their so as to live in peace in future, no useful purpose would be proceeding further with the criminal proceedings. In the light IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20202-2025 Date of Decision: April 11, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Arun Chander Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. By way of present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS rayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.701 dated 1) under Sections 279, 336 and 427 of IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, whereas Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of complainant- At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has the complainant has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed against the petitioner. he parties having settled their ture, no useful purpose would be proceeding further with the criminal proceedings. In the light 2025 Date of Decision: April 11, 2025 By way of present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS rayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.701 dated 1) under Sections 279, 336 and 427 of IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana who is present in State, whereas Mr. - At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has the complainant has no objection in case the FIR he parties having settled their ture, no useful purpose would be proceeding further with the criminal proceedings. In the light MAHIMA 2025.04.11 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-20202-2025 -2- of above developments, no cause remains for the Trial Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR. 6. Thus, the present petition is allowed and the FIR (supra) as well as all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner. 11.04.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No MAHIMA 2025.04.11 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. MAHIMA 2025.04.11 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.