IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA SECOND APPEAL NO: 21 OF 9()nA Appeal Under Section 100 of C.P.C dated 05 09.2003 made in A.S.No.13 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Guntur. O.S.No.7 of 1997 (old 199 of 1995) dated 29.10. of the Senior Civil Judge Gurazala. RAO against the Judgment and Decree V Preferred against the Decree in 1998 on the file of the Court Between: 1. Kurakula Venkateswar Reddy, S/o.Kotireddy, Hindu, Aged 49 years Agriculturist, R/o.Karalapadu, Piduguralla Mandal, per LRs 2 to 4) 2. Kurakula Venkayamma, W/o Late K. Venkateswar 55 years, Housewife 3. Kurakula Venkat Rami Reddy, W/o K. Venkateswar 33 years. Agriculture, 4. Kurakula Venkat Reddy, S/o Late K. 26 years. Agriculture. Guntur District. (Died Reddy, Aged about Reddy, aged about Venkateswar Reddy, Aged about (All are R/o Karalapadu, Pidugurall Mandal, (App. 2 to 4 are brought Guntur District) on record as per LRs of the deceased sole appellant vide Court Order dated 06.03.2012 in SAMP No 627 of 2011) ...Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff AND ir 1. Timmaraju Satyanarayana (died), S/o. Venkata Subba Rao, Hindu, Aged about 72 years. Retired Employee Kothapet, Chirala, Prakasam District. ...Respondent/Respondents/Defendant 2. Smt. Timmaraju Annpurnamma, W/o. late Timmaraju Satyanaryana, Aged about 60 years. Housewife, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 3. Timmaraju Bhagyalaxmi, D/o. Late Timmaraju Satyanarayana, Aged about 40 years, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 4. Timmaraju Prasanamba, D/o. late Timmaraju Satyanarayana, Aged about 38 years, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. Parvathi, D/o. Late Timmaraju Satyanarayana, Aged about 36 years, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. Timmaraju Seetha Mahalaxmi, D/o. Late Timmaraju Satyanarayana, Aged about 34 years, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampanchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. 7. Suryakumari, D/o. late Timmarju. Satyanarayana, Aged aobut 32 years, R/o. ILTD Colony, 4-45/1, Kothapeta Grampa.nchayat, Vetlapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. (Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole Respondent, vide lA No. 3 of 2013 (SAMP No.69/2013), as per the Court Order dated 22-10-2024) ...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: SRI G. KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SRINIVAS EMANI The Court made the following JUDGMENT: ^ APHC010033422004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 21/2004 Between: J Kurakula Venkateswar Reddy ...APPELLANT / AND Timmaraju Satyanarayana Died and Others Counsel for the Appellant: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ASURYANARAYANA 2.SRINIVAS EMANI The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 05.09.2003 passed in A.S.No.13 of 1999 on the file of learned V Additional District Judge-cum-Sessions Judge’s Court, Guntur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 28.10.1998 passed in O.S.No.07 of 1997 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Gurazala. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that upon contacting the learned counsel who represented the appellants in the trial court, she was informed that the delivery 2. I proceedings had already been concluded. In view of the above information, learned counsel contends that the appeal has become infructuous. Considering the submissions made on behalf of both sides, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR '\ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Guntur, (with records if any) The Senior Civil Judge, Gurazala. One CC to Sri G Krishna Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri A Suryanarayana, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Srinivas Emani, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Three CD Copies To, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. sree HIGH COURT DATED:27/01/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.21 of 2004 o ^ X 15 FEB 2023 ^ current section ^ n’t eofc DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS