MRK,J W.P.No.19068 of 2017 APHC010407742017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19068/2017 Between: 1. G A SAZID, KURNOOL DIST., OCC: DRIVER, E.427964, R/O. 14-89, ASSARA MAJID, ATAMAKUR (K), KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APSRTC VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DIST 2 OTRS, DIRECTOR, PANDIT JEWARLAL NEHRU BUS STAND, BUS HOUSE, VIJAWAYADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. A P S R T C REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER KURNOOL, REGION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER A P S R T C YEMMIGANUR DEPOT KURNOOL, DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue 'an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in rejecting the case of the petitioner for providing alternative employment to the petitioner vide proceedings No.P1/756(01)/2017-YMG, dated 22.04.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to provide an alternate employment in any suitable post to the petitioner, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 23227 OF 2017 MRK,J W.P.No.19068 of 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner by providing an alternate employment in any suitable post, pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) MRK,J W.P.No.19068 of 2017 The Court made the following ORDER: On 20.12.2015, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. Post next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’.” 2. Today also, none appeared for the petitioner in spite of the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 Dvs MRK,J W.P.No.19068 of 2017 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 43 WRIT PETITION No.19068 of 2017 Date: 24.12.2025 Dvs