Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44984 (KAR)

RAMAPPA S/O GANAGAPPA TIGADI DEAD BY HIS LRS v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

WP/104465/2024 · 2025-02-25

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104465 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RAMAPPA S/O GANAGAPPA TIGADI DEAD BY HIS LRS PRAKASH RAMAPPA TIGADI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 2. DUNDAPPA @ DODDAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA PATTED AGE. 80 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 3. CHANABASAPPA S/O LAXMAN TIGADI DEAD BY HIS LRS S.C.TIGADI AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 4. MADIWALAPPA S/O VEERABHADRAPPA KULLOLI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 5. MADIWALAPPA S/O PUNDALIKAPPA RUMOJI AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 6. KASHAPPA S/O PARAPPA MARUTAMMANAVAR AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI 7. MADIWALAPPA S/O SADEPPA PADASALAGI DEAD BY HIS LRS SHIVANAND S/O MADIWALAPPA PADASALAGI AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEGINHAL TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. OMKAR LAXMAN DESAI,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, BAGALKOT DIST. BAGALKOT 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LIMITED - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 MLBC DIVISION NO.2, NAVILUTHEERTH TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST. BELAGAVI …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. KANAVI., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTIONS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07- 08-2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND PAY THE DAMAGES/COMPENSATION AMOUNT FROM THE DATE OF TAKING POSSESSION TILL THE DATE OF 4(1) NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.26 MEASURING 30 GUNTAS, SY.NO.15/1A, 15/1E, 15/AP MEASURING 01 ACRE 28 GUNTAS, SY.NO. 89 MEASURING 31 GUNTAS, SY.NO. 80 MEASURING 34 GUNTAS, SY.NO. 35/1B/2 MEASURING 12 GUNTAS, SY. 39/112 MEASURING 36 GUNTAS AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other order or directions directing the R1 to consider the representation dated: 07.08.2018 vide Annexure-C and pay the damages/compensation amount from the date of taking possession till the date of 4(1) Notification in respect of Sy.No.26 measuring 30 guntas, Sy.No.15/1A, 15/1E, 15/AP measuring 01 acre 28 guntas, Sy.No. 89 measuring 31 guntas, Sy.No. 80 measuring 34 guntas, Sy.No. 35/1B/2 * Corrected vide court order dated 05.08.2025 Sd/- SGRJ - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 measuring 12 guntas, Sy. 39/112 measuring 36 guntas to the petitioners respectively with all consequential benefits taking into consideration similar damages/awards passed by the 1st Respondent in the ends of justice and equity. b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any directions, directing R1 to pay additional interest by way of damages, at the rate of 15% per annum from the period between taking possession till 4(1) Notification as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Balwan Sing and Others vs. LAO and others, AIR 2016 SC 1565. c. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any directions, directing the Respondents to pay interest for the delayed payment period, in the ends of justice and equity. 2. Petitioners claim to be the owners of the various lands which were acquired for the purpose of Malaprabha Reservoir Project and award has been passed on 24.12.2009 granting certain compensation, which compensation was enhanced by the Reference Court. 3. The petitioners claim that even before the acquisition proceedings were completed, possession of lands of the petitioners were taken by respondents depriving the petitioners of income from the said properties - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 and as such representation was submitted on 07.08.2018 for grant of damages/award. 4. Sri.M.B.Kanavi, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 however contends that the possession was not taken over prior to the acquisition being completed and as such, no damages/award of similar amount would have to be paid in favour of the petitioners. 5. A representation is submitted by the petitioners on 07.08.2018, the fact remains that no order has been passed thereon. Even if, the respondents have good ground on merits, it was for the respondents to pass an order on the said representation either accepting or rejecting the representation. 6. Needless to say that, if the representation is rejected, the same would be accompanied by reasons. 7. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners and respondents to agitate all the issues before respondent No.1, petition stands disposed of. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3860 WP No. 104465 of 2024 8. Respondent No.1 shall pass necessary orders within 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0