SHRI SHRIPAL S/O RAMCHANDRA ANGADI v. SMT. GANGUBAI MANKAR
CCC/100103/2025 · 2025-04-15
C M Poonacha, S G Pandit
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44982 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44982 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6404-DB CCC No. 100103 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100103 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI SHRIPAL S/O RAMCHANDRA ANGADI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
2.
DHARENEDRA RAMCHANDRA ANGADI AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
3.
MAHAVEER RAMACHANDRA ANGADI AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O HUNGUND, TQ. MUNDGOD, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA 581320. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. GANGUBAI MANKAR AGE. 46 YEARS. OCC. DC., THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UTTAR KANNADA, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA 581320.
2.
SMT. APARNA RAMESH SIRSI AGE. 32 YEARS, ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA 581320.
3.
SHRI SHANKAR GOUDI GANGUBAI MANKAR AGE. 38 YEARS, THE TAHASILADAR, MUNDAGOD TALUK, TQ. MUNDAGOD, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA 581320.
4.
SHRI SHIVAPPA ROPALAPPA LAMANI AGE. 42 YEARS. OCC. COOLI, R/O. ANGADI, TQ. MUNDAGOD, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA 581320. …ACCUSED
5.
STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6404-DB CCC No. 100103 of 2025
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO, PUNISH TO ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDING FOR HAVING COMMITTED CIVIL CONTEMPT OF THE IMPUGNED
ORDER IN W.P.
NO.100464/2024 DATED 22.08.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC.
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
This contempt petition is filed complaining disobedience of order dated 22.08.2024 passed in WP No.100464/2024, wherein this Court issued a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 7.12.2023 passed in PTCL No.3/2023.
2. Under order dated 7.12.2023 in PTCL No.3/2023, the Deputy Commissioner allowed the appeal filed under Section 5A(1-A) of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (PTCL) Act 1978 by setting aside the order of Assistant Commissioner.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6404-DB CCC No. 100103 of 2025
3. It is the grievance of the complainant that even after allowing the writ petition and setting aside the order of Deputy Commissioner, the complainant’s/purchaser’s name is not being entered in the revenue records. There is no further direction in the order of the learned Single Judge, but the consequences by virtue of learned Single Judge’s shall have to follow in accordance with law. It is for the complainant to get his name entered in the revenue records in accordance with law by initiating appropriate proceedings.
4. When there is no specific direction to enter the name of the complainant, the complainant cannot invoke contempt jurisdiction. The complainant shall have to initiate other appropriate proceedings. Accordingly, contempt petition is rejected.
Pending applications, if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration.
Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE JTR, CT:VP