Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44981 (CHH)

PARMESHWAR v. AVINASH CHAMPAWAT,

CONT/1407/2024 · 2025-05-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20150 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1407 of 2024 1. Parmeshwar S/o Late Ramsanehi Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Chhatan District - Mungeli (C.G.) 2. Ramsaran S/o Late Ramsanehi Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Chhatan District - Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1. Avinash Champawat, Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Rahul Dev Collector Mungeli District - Mungeli (C.G.) 3. Parwati Patel Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ Land Acquisition Officer Mungeli District - Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sushobhit Singh and Shri T.R. Patel, Advocates For Respondent No.1 : Shri Neeraj Choubey, Adv. on behalf of Shri Rajeev Bharat, Advocate For Respondents No.2&3 : Ms Akanksha Jain & Ms Anuradha Jain, Advocates Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. 2 -5-2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 & 3 would submit that by communication/notice dated 9-9-2023 K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2025.05.02 16:35:26 +0530 2 (Annexure-R3/3) of the SDO it has been stated that after verifying the submission made by the petitioners the final award has been passed and asked the petitioners to collect the amount, however, the petitioners failed to respond to the said communication. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that no award has been passed till date as mentioned in Annexure-R3/3 dated 9-9-2023 and in the memo dated 4-12-2017 and if any award has been passed the petitioners will question the same before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the parties, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. 4. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to question the memo dated 4-12-2017 & 9-9-2023 before the appropriate forum, if so advised. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri