Vegesna Venugopala Hanmanth Varma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/9700/2025 · 2025-04-20
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44977 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44977 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IH IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9700 OF 2025 Between: Vegesna Venugopala Hanmanth Varma, S/o Vegesna Venkat Raiu aged about 26 years, R/o H.No.3-75, Mahalakshmipuram China Kapavaram Village Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, West Godavari District
3. The Tahsildar, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari A.P. Bhimavaram Ditstrict ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction may more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, for herein to consider and a direction to the 2nd Respondent pass appropriate orders on the Appeal and as well as suspension petition filed by the petitioner on 6-3-2025 (under Sec. 10(1) of Land Encroachment Act, 1905), challenging the 3 proceedings/ endorsement dt.10- 12-2024 vide Rc.No.736/2024/B. rd Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2n9fi Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the 2 praying that in the circumstances m support of the petition, the High Court may be ' Respondent herein to nd consider and pass
appropriate orders on the appeal as well as the stay petition filed by the petitioner dt. 6-3-2025 challenging the 3^“ Respondent proceedings/ endorsement dt.10-12- 2024 vide Rc.No.736/2024/B, the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: pending disposal of
$ > APHC010182962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
"0 [3329] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9700/2025 Between: Vegesna Venugopala Hanmanth Varma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION N0:9700/2025
ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief:
“to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS for a direction to the 2nd Respondent herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on the Appeal and as well as suspension petition filed by the petitioner on 632025 under Sec 101 of Land Encroachment Act 1905 challenging the 3rd Respondent proceedings/ endorsement dt 10 122024 vide Rc No 736/2024/B and pass and pass such other
order or orders....” Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government
2. Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will be suffice if a
3. nd direction is given to respondent authorities, more particularly, 2 respondent herein to consider and dispose of the Appeal dated 06.03.2025 preferred by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would
4. submit that the Appeal dated 06.03.2025 preferred by the petitioner
would be considered by the respondent authorities, in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the
learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the Appeal, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction.
6. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is
disposed of, with a direction to the respondent authorities, more particularly, 2^^ respondent herein to consider the Appeal dated 06.03.2025 preferred by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to both the parties, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till disposal of the said Appeal, Status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by all the parties concerned. There shall be no order as to costs.
2019 (8) SCALE 544
f- Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER i To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District, A.P.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, West Godavari District, Bhimavaram.
3. The Tahsildar, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District.
4. One CC to Sri B Chandra Shekhar, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies RAM
n ■ HIGH COURT DATED:21/04/2025 ANDSigJ X 09 MAY 2025 B ^ . Current Section SsspAXcy^-^
ORDER WP.No.9700 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS