Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44973 (RAJ)

DARSHNA RATHORE, D/O SHRI DALIP SINGH RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16524/2025 · 2025-11-01

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43906] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16524/2025 Darshna Rathore, D/o Shri Dalip Singh Rathore, R/o 67, Gopal Bari, Vidhayak Puri, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, (Rajasthan) 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, (Rajasthan) 3. Director General Of Police, Department Of Police, Rajasthan Police Headquater, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Youth Affairs And Sports, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rachit Sharma Mr. Madhav Dadhich For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow the present Writ Petition and be further pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, thereby directing the Respondents to consider and appoint the Petitioner to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police under the provisions of the Rajasthan Out of Turn Appointment to Sports Medal Winners Rules, 2017. [2025:RJ-JP:43906] (2 of 2) [CW-16524/2025] It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass such order and further orders as may be deemed just, fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /13