NANDITA HALDER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/26428/2024 · 2025-08-21
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44973 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44973 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No. 237 Court No. 35 G.S.Das
21.08.2025
WPA 26428 of 2024
Nandita Halder -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Dipanjan Datta Mr. Sanatan Panja
… for the State-Respondent(s)
The writ petition earlier appeared on 11.11.2024 when an accommodation was sought for on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition again appeared on 04.12.2024 when none represented the petitioner.
Today, also, when the writ petition is called, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
As none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Dipanjan Datta, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State is directed to represent the State. Mr. Datta is entitled to have a junior of his choice. The appointment of
both Mr. Datta and the junior of his choice, if any, be regularized by the concerned authority.
In view the petitioner no more desirous to pursue with the writ petition further, WPA 26428 of 2024 is dismissed for default.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)