APHC010701252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 36085/2025 Between: 1. BERI POLAMMA, W/O. LATE BERI KANNAYYA, AGED 71 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.H.NO.1-60,BODDAPALEMVILLAGE, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANDAPAURAM POLICE STATION, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. TONANGI APPA RAO, S/O.LATE RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. BODDAPALEM VILLAGE, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. SADI MUTYALU REDDY, S/O.LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. BODDAPALEM VILLAGE, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. SADI APPALA RAJU BULLI REDDY, S/O.LATE AKKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. BODDAPALEM VILLAGE, ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. KAKARA RAMANA, S/O.LATE APPAYYA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. VELLANKI POST AND VILLAGE ANANDAPAURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. BUSA YARRAYYA, S/O.LATE APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. CHAITANYA NAGAR, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 11. BUSA CHITTEMMA, W/O. YARRAYYA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. CHAITANYA NAGAR, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly the Respondents 4 and 5, at the instance of Respondents 6 to 11 in interfering with petitioners possession and enjoyment and insisting her to vacate from her landed property in Sy. No. 278/1, to an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents out of Ac. 1.00 cents, situated at Boddapalem Village, Anandapauram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following any known procedure established by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over her said landed property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over her landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.03 cents out of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey No. 278/1 of Boddapalem Village, Anandapauram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. APPALARAJU SADI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No:36085/2025 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date:24.12.2025 BV