Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44972 (AP)

MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS v. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, IAS

CC/3149/2024 · 2025-03-25

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVAT^ *‘9 *U WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3149 OF 2024 Contempt case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willfully violating and disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 10/01/2024 in WP No. 29989/2023. Between: M/s. Maruthi Constructions, Rep by its Managing Partner, B.Trivikram, S/o. BRK Murthy, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Contractor, R/o. D.No.54-14/1-9/5, Bharathi Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Anil Kumar Singhal, IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. (R. 1) 2. Dhayana Chandra H.M., Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. (R.3) 3. Samrajyam, The Executive Engineer Corporation, Vijayawada. (R.5) 4. Peeyush Kumar, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. (R.6) X Circle-Ill, Municipal ...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y V S S DHARANEESH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: m APHC010322652024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3149/2024 Between: Maruthi Constructions ...PETITIONER AND Anil Kumar Singhal las and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...CONTEMNOR(S) 1.YVSS DHARANEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2.J DILEEP KUMAR Th^Court made the following: ORDER The above contempt case is filed complaining violation of the order dated 10.01.2024 in W.P.No.29989 of 2023. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that order in the writ petition has been complied with. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is Closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri Anil Kumar Singhal, IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. Sri Dhayana Chandra H.M., Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. M/s. Samrajyam, The Executive Engineer - III, Circle-Ill, Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada. 4. Sri Peeyush Kumar, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 5. One CC to Sri Y V S S Dharaneesh, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri J Dileep Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Three CD Copies TF •i- X HIGH COURT DATED:26/03/2025 \ ORDER CC.No.3149 of 2024 g> OY X jsm jws mi. co/i *3r# O Current Section X CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE