4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (SpeciaI Origiri^Wurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 4572 OF 2021 A'i » s' -^4' ■ " \ *4 . *’ H .-s-. Between: Donkada Kamala, W/o.Kameswara Rao, Aged about 63 years, R/o.Vepagunta, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District, Rep. by its Executive Officer. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4 respondent in interfering with fie petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of house site, catered in an extent of 23.02 sq.yds., situated in Sy.No. 75 (Sy.No. 75-5/42170) of Vep^gunta Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following due process of law and in making kforts to dispossess the petitioner jherefrom, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4*^ respondent to refrain from doing so. th • # lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent not to interfere in any manner, whatsoever, with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of house site, covered in an exten^of 23.02 sq.yds., situated in Sy.No.75 (Sy.No.75-75/42170) of Vepag'imta Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Sri Madhava Reddy, Standing Counsel The Court made the following: APHC010078172021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 4572/2021 • I [3505] Between; Donkada Kamala ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VSURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU % 2 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner 1. that in view of the subsequent events, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive. 2. The submission made by the learned counsel is placed on record and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. SDI- V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// 1 '■\ SECTION OFFICER To SRI. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 1. OneCCto 2. One CC to Sri K.Madhava Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC] GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Two CCs to [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies KSR HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER 5 ? «SEP 2025 ^ . Current section , WP.No.4572 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS