Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44966 (RAJ)

JAMALU S/O SHRI AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14872/2025 · 2025-11-27

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48162] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14872/2025 Jamalu S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Nainapur, P.s. Baroda Mev, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma with Mr. Harshit Parashar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, P.P. Mr. Sudhir Jain Mr. Bilal Ahamad HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 27/11/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.250/2025 registered at Police Station Baroda Meo, District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 117(2) & 110 of B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and he is behind the bars since 30.10.2025. Counsel further submits that the petitioner's age is 60 years and a cross FIR bearing No.252/2025 has also been lodged by the petitioner. Counsel further contends that although, both the parties have sustained injuries in the alleged incident which are not dangerous to life. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time [2025:RJ-JP:48162] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14872/2025] to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant-respondent have vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that Ali Mohammad and Saddam have sustained head injuries. Thus, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. deserves to be dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely Jamalu S/o Shri Amar Singh, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /168