1 2025:CGHC:50268-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5297 of 2025 M/s Ghanshyam Laundry Through Its Proprietor Shri Ghanshyam Choudhary Aged About 45 Years S/o Shri Ganpat Ram Aged About 64 Years R/o H.No. 504, Dhobipara Raja Talab, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare New Delhi 2. The Director Aiims Raipur Tatibandh, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. The Deputy Director (Administration Aiims Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. The Stores Officer (Central) Office Of The Stores Department Of Central Procurement, Aiims Raipur Tatibandh Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Sudhanshu Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09/10/2025 1. Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.09 17:55:53 +0530 2 Also heard Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following prayer:- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present writ petition & call for the entire record pertaining to the present case. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent AIIMS, Raipur in rejecting the representation of Petitioner against the impugned email communication / intimation dated 04-08- bearing Tender of the 2025 in respect GEM/2025/B/6192169 which has been wrongly rejected by the respondent authorities vide order dated 27.08.2025 as absolutely illegal, arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law as well as settled legal position and also against the general principles of contract and consequently quash the same. (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly of Respondent AIIMS, Raipur to issue the work order in favor of petitioner in relation to the Tender bearing No. GEM/2025/B/6192169. (iv) That, any other order/relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the facts and 3 circumstances of the present case may also kindly be awarded to the petitioner in the ends of justice & equity. (v) That the cost of the petition may -kindly also be awarded to the petitioner. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that third party interest has been created pursuance to the question tender process and seeks permission of the court to withdraw the instant petition. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ respondent after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti