Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44959 (RAJ)

MANISHA DAUGHTER OF TULSI RAM NAYAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2219/2025 · 2025-10-06

Ashok Kumar Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40343] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2219/2025 Manisha Daughter Of Tulsi Ram Nayak, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of 845/40, Ganesh Nagar, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Disaster Management, Relief And Civil Defence Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Directorate For Civil Defence, Rajasthan, Jaipur, 0-1, T.b. Sentorium Road, Subhash Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) New Address- 10/p/8/c, Sector-10, Sarkar Dispensary Ke Paas, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Directorate Of Civil Defence, Rajasthan, Jaipur, 0-1, T.b. Sentorium Road, Subhash Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Controller (Collector), Civil Defence, Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj.). 5. Deputy Controller Of Civil Defence, Ajmer. 6. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Joshi For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/10/2025 1. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that on earlier occasion, writ petitioner has filed a S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16409/2024 and same was disposed of on 26.11.2024, by a Coordinate Bench. [2025:RJ-JP:40343] (2 of 2) [CW-2219/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that in pursuant to order dated 26.11.2024, a representation has been filed to respondent No.2, but still, same has not been decided by respondent No.2. He also submits that present petitioner is not informed about current status of the representation submitted by petitioner to respondent No.2. 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner offers to withdraw instant S.B. Civil Writ Petition with liberty to file contempt petition against the contemnor(s). 4. In view of aforesaid, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 5. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /16