Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4495 (UTT)

SANTOSH MATA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/426/2025 · 2025-03-27

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 426 of 2025 Smt. Santosh Mata and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present: Mr. Siddharth Singh Negi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Standing Counsel for the State of UP/respondent nos. 2 and 3. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral) By means of instant petition, the petitioners have sought the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the interest @ 9% per annum upon delayed payment of arrears of revised pay scale to the petitioners forthwith as the respondents have paid the said benefit to the similarly situated person. (ii) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iii) To award the cost of the petitions in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 20.12.2024, passed in WPSS No. 2376 of 2024, Premwati Sharma and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 20.12.2024, passed in WPSS No. 2376 of 2024, Premwati Sharma and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.03.2025 Jitendra