MEETA GAWRI AND ANR v. KAMAL KISHORE YADAV AND ORS.
COCP/6080/2025 · 2026-02-23
Alka Sarin
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4495 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4495 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-6080-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 23.02.2026
Dr. Meeta Gawri and Another ... Petitioner (s) Versus Kamal Kishore Yadav and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate for
Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG Punjab.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
1.
This is a petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for initiation of proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the order dated 12.12.2024 passed in CWP-13757-2016.
2.
Compliance report by way of an affidavit of Sh. S. Gurkirat Kirpal Singh, Administrative Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce, Punjab has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record. Along with the compliance report, speaking order dated 20.02.2026 (Annexure R-4) has also been appended.
3.
In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off as such. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
4.
Needless to say that the petitioners would always be at liberty to challenge the speaking order in accordance with law.
23.02.2026 Ankur Goyal
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking
Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2026.02.24 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment