Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4495 (BOM)

KALYAN RAGHUNATH BARHATE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/11037/2025 · 2026-09-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 916.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 WRIT PETITION NO. 11037 OF 2025 KALYAN RAGHUNATH BARHATE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Aditya V Waghmare And Mr. Mahesh K Bhosale AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. Shelke Avishkar S. … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 01.09.2026 PER COURT : . This petition is filed seeking directions to respondents/MSEDCL to pay compensation to the petitioners. 2. Learned Advocate for the MSEDCL submits that, there are deficiencies in the application submitted by the petitioners and that the relevant documents are required to be submitted by the petitioners. The petitioners are informed about the same vide communication dated 27.03.2026. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that, he has not received any communication from the respondents. However, a copy of the said communication is handed over to him in the Court. 4. In the above backdrop, the petitioners shall submit the documents mentioned in the communication dated 27.03.2026, within a period of six (06) weeks from today. 2026:BHC-AUG:40202-DB 2 916.doc 5. Upon submission of the documents by the petitioners, the respondents shall decide the claim of the petitioners within a period of eight (08) weeks thereafter. 6. With the above observations, Writ Petition stands disposed of. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) vsj..