SMT BASAVVA W/O LATE NIGAPPA LAD v. SMT. SIDDAVVA W/O BHAGANNA LAD
WP/106823/2023 · 2025-04-09
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44949 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44949 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6311 WP No. 106823 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106823 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. BASAVVA W/O LATE NINGAPPA LAD, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SHAMBAJI GALLI, ASTHE VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 016.
2.
SMT. SUREKHA W/O ARJUN KALLANNAVAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: INAMDAR GALLI, MARIHAL, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-591 103.
3.
SMT. LAXMI W/O SANJAY PALKAR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MARUTHI GALLI, SAMBRA VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-591 124.
4.
SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O DEVENDRA DEVAKATTI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: LAXMI GALLI, KONDASKOPP, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 005.
5.
SRI. KRISHNA S/O LATE NINGAPPA LAD, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SHAMBAJI GALLI, ASTHE VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 016.
… PETITIONERS (BY MISS AMRUTHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6311 WP No. 106823 of 2023
AND:
SMT. SIDDAVVA W/O BHAGANNA LAD, AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ASHTE VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 016.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. I.Y. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Miss.Amrutha., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mrutyunjay Tata Bangi., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo is filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by counsel on record and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6311 WP No. 106823 of 2023
The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 28