Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:8622
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 41 of 2024 1 - Abhishek Tiwari S/o Late Shri Prabhudyal Tiwari, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 42 Karamveer Nagar, Narela Sankari Piplani, P.S. Piplani Tahsil Hujur, Distt. Bhopal (M.P.) 2 - Manish Tiwari S/o Late Shri Prabhudyal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 42 Karamveer Nagar, Narela Sankari Piplani, P.S. Piplani, Tahsil Hujur, Distt. Bhopal (M.P.) 3 - Smt. Sarita Tiwari W/o Late Shri Prabhudyal Tiwari, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 42 Karamveer Nagar, Narela Sankari Piplani, P.S. Piplani, Tahsil Hujur, Distt. Bhopal (M.P.)
... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Women Police Station Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Priyanka Dubey W/o Shri Abhishek Tiwari, Aged About 34 Years, D/o Shri Satyanarayan Dubey, R/o E-27, Rishabh Nagar Amalidh Raipur, P.S. Rajendranagar, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate. For State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2 Mr. Priyank Rathi, Advocate. Division Bench Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN
2
Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19-02-2025
1. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“it is therefore, prayed that the instant petition may kindly be allowed and the Chargesheet of Crime No.120/2022 registered at women police station Raipur and further proceedings of criminal case No.17533/2022 pending before JMFC Raipur against the petitioners, may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.”
2.
Learned counsel for the parties have jointly stated that dispute between the parties is matrimonial one and both of them have entered into compromise and compromise application dated 22- 07-2024 has been moved before the Family Court, Raipur and copy of the same has been filed along with affidavit of petitioner No.1 in the present petition. The said application has been moved by the parties before the Family court that the matter has been settled between them and according to compromise, Rs.5,00,000/- will be given to the complainant, out of which Rs.2,50,000/- has been received by the complainant, whereas remaining balance will be paid after quashing of the present matter which has been lodged under Section 498-A of the IPC.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed and the parties are
directed to appear before the learned trial Court who shall
3 consider the compromise entered between the parties and pass appropriate orders accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil