APHC010066812009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 18595/2009 Between: 1. GOSALA SUBBA RAMI REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY AGRICULTURIST R/O. KRISHNAPADU, SOMAVARAPADU POST, JALADANKI MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & CAD DEPARTMENT NELLORE NORTH DIVISION, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & CAD DEPARTMENT KAVALI EAST DIVISION, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the Proceedings No. 45 KE, dated 28-8-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, violation of principles of natural justice, and in violation of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently set-aside the same. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 24310 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further sproceedings purusant to the Proceedings No. 45 KE, dated 2 VS,J W.P.No.18595 of 2009 28-8-2009, issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV 2. 5644/MD MUBARIZ The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.18595 of 2009 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 16.12.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, as such, the matter was posted to 22.12.2025. Even on 22.12.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called, the matter was directed to be posted on 24.12.2025, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the present case. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 24.12.2025 Gss