Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44940 (ORI)

SURAJ KHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/7352/2025 · 2025-07-31

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7352 of 2025 Suraj Khan … Petitioner Mr. D. Mohapatra, Sr. Advocate Along with Mr. C.K.Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. T.K. Acharya, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 31.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Nemalo PS Case No.131 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.233 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Nishintakoili Cuttack, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.288/106(1) of BNS & Sec.3/4/5 of Explosive substance Act, on the allegation of assisting co-accused to possess explosive substance which facilitated preparation of bomb by the deceased who died in the course of treatment for sustaining injury in the explosion while preparing bombs. 3. Heard, Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned senior counsel, who is being assisted by Mr. C.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Acharya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record. p. 2 4. It is undoubtedly true that the name of the petitioner does not find place in the FIR, but he has been detained in custody since 03.06.2025. Further, one of the co-accused Sk. Tayub Ali has been given the benefit of pre-arrest bail in ABLAPL No.7366 of 2025. In such view of the matter, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner-Suraj Khan to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioner shall appear before the IO as and when required till submission of charge-sheet. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Jayakrushna