IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WPIAT) NO: 1129 OF 2021 Between: K Padmavathi, D/o. K.Ananda Rao, aged about 32 Years, Unemployee R/o Adivarampeta, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its principal Secretary, School Education (Ser.V)Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 522001 2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education Govt ofAP D.No. 7-104, B.BIock, Sri Anjaneya Towers, NTTPS Road Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District 521 001 3. The District Educational Officer, Srikakulam District at 5rikakulam. 531 001 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare action of the respondents in not issuing appointment order in favour of the applicant herein as Hindi Pandit though she got more marks than some of the appointed candidates and were placed above her in the merit list of DSC.2002, Hindi Pandits Grade.II as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to Rule and in violation of Article. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant and issued appointment orders as Hindi Pandit GRADE II in the existing vacancies or if necessary by creating supernumarary post, following the orders passed by this Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No. 982 and 983 of 2009 dated 24.8.2010 and batch cases and im orders in OA1831/2017 dated 7.7.2017 as the applicant herein got marks than some of the appointed candidated as per merit list of DSt 2002. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI K. R. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010412622021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 [3311] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 1129/2021 Between: ...PETITIONER K.Padmavathi AND State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KRSRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 2 W.P.(AT).No.1129 of 2021 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to declare action of the respondents in not issuing appointment order in favour of the applicant herein as Hindi Pandit though she got more marks than some of the appointed candidates and were placed above her in the merit list of DSC.2002, Hindi Pandits Grade.II as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to Rule and in violation of Article. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant and issued appointment orders as Hindi Pandit Grade.II in the existing vacancies or if necessary by creating supernumarary post, following the orders passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.982 and 983 of 2009 dated 24.8.2010 and batch cases and interim orders in O.A.No.1831 of 2017 dated 7.7.2017 as the applicant herein got more marks than some of the appointed candidates as per merit list of DSC 2002...” Ms. G.Manasa, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous. 02. 03. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSSSTANT REGISTRAR jiU-—^ SECTSON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri K. R. Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:03/03/2025 ORDER WP(AT).No.1129 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WP(AT) AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS