Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH (127)
CR 2326 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 Amritpal Singh and another
…Petitioners
Versus
Ranjit Singh and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Ashish Chopra, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Rupa Pathania, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Pooja Sareen, Advocate
and Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate
for the respondents.
**** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
1.
The report of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana has been received and perused.
2.
The sole prayer of the petitioner at this stage is that during the pendency of the review petition seeking review of order dated 17.03.2025, the respondents be restrained from withdrawing the compensation.
3.
A perusal of the record shows that though such prayer was made before the Court before which the review application has been filed, no order appears to have been passed.
4.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present revision petition be disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to expeditiously hear the review application and to decide the prayer for the grant of interim protection within the next two weeks.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE May 06, 2025
Rekha
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.07 05:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh