HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 44574 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Vaibhav Singh holding brief of Sri Vivek Saran, learned counsel for the respondent-Awas Vikas are present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 23, 2025 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishi Kumar Tripathi, Vikas Mani Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.P. Srivastava, Vivek Saran (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Shivam Resident Welfare Association And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad