I- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7419 OF 207^ t i V- Between: Thanikonda Madhava Rao, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged about Occ.Agriculture, R/o.Divivaripalem village, Kandukur Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District. 51 years, / ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Circle Inspect of Police, Kandukur, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Station House Officer, Kandukur (Rural) Police Station, SPSR Nellore District 5. The Sub-collector, Kandukur,S.P.S.R.Nellore District. 6. The Tahsildar, Kandukur, S.P.S.R.Nellore District. 7. Thanikonda Srinivasulu @ Srinivasula Chowdary, S/o. Malakondaiah, aged 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Divivaripalem village, Kandukur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. / ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one praying that in the may be in % extent of Ac 0-10 cents to Respondent No. 7 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5,6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: — The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010145172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7419/2025 Between: Thanikonda Madhava Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) r THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.7419 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4 respondent, at the behest of the 7**^ respondent, is repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and interfering with the civil dispute. A direction is sought to respondents 3 to 6 not to interfere with the peace of the petitioner and also with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land belonging to the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police received a complaint from the respondent and that in pursuance of the preliminary enquiry, the petitioner was called to the police station and ascertained that the dispute between the petitioner and the 7*^ respondent is civil in nature and have advised to resolve the same before the civil court. 1. th 2. 3. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. OH, P VINOD KUWIAR ^S&STANVREGiSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE To, SRI. MD SALEEM, Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to 2. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME, 3. Two CCS to GP FOR REVNUE High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three C.D.Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:27/03/2025 ORDER ^21JUL aiSy^. WP.No.7419 of 2025 CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS