(1) 50 FCA-66.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2025 NEHA KALPESH PATIL VERSUS KALPESH SOMNATH PATIL … Mr. Akshay Mulange, Advocate holding for Mr. Jitendra Patil, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.B. Munde, Advocate for the respondent. … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. Per Court : 1. During pendency of this appeal, the matter was referred to the Mediator. The concerned learned Mediator then forwarded report dated 11.08.2026 to this Court mentioning that mediation is successful. Alongwith the said report the learned Mediator has also forwarded compromise terms entered into by the appellant and respondent. 2. We have verified the compromise terms and conditions mentioned therein through the parties who are personally present before the Court today. The parties, who are duly represented by their concerned advocates, have admitted the terms and conditions of the compromise terms. (2) 50 FCA-66.2025.odt 3. In view of the same, consent terms are taken on record and accepted. The decree be drawn up accordingly in terms of those consent terms. 4. The appeal is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde