- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6278 WP No. 100546 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO.100546 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: SMT RENUKA KOM YELLAPPA BACHHANAVAR, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KONDASKOP, TAL AND DIST: BELAGAVI – 590001. …PETITIONER (BY SHRI SHARAD MALGOUND PATIL, ADV.) AND: 1. LAND TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BELGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI 590016. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALURU - 560001. 3. SHRI LAXMAN DATTARAYA BAMBURE, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: ARICULTURE, Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6278 WP No. 100546 of 2024 R/O: CHANDGAD, TAL AND DIST: KOLHAPUR - 416509. STATE: MAHARASHTRA. 4. SADASHIV D BAMBURE, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHANDGAD, TAL AND DIST: KOLHAPUR - 416509. STATE. MAHARASHTRA. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: A) ISSUE QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14/05/1981 BEARING NO.KONDASKOP PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 LAND TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI VIDE ANNEXURE-C, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1/LAND TRIBUNAL TO GRANT OF OCCUPANCY RIGHTS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS IN QUESTION. C) PASS SUCH ORDER OR ORDERS WHICH THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND NECESSARY UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6278 WP No. 100546 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and called again at 3.00 p.m. As per order sheet dated 08.08.2024, finally three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections and order dated 30.08.2024 also, finally four weeks time is granted for the same purpose. In spite of that, the office objections are not complied with. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE EM CT:ANB List No.: 3 Sl No.: 14