Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44902 (CHH)

AFSANA TANVEER KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/888/2024 · 2025-01-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:831-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 888 of 2024 Afsana Tanveer Khan D/o Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Aged About 45 Years Assistant Project OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Under Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Develpment, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 4. Tribhuvan Singh Verma, Assistant Project OfÏcer, Development Extention OfÏcer, Janpad Panchayat, Kasdol, District-Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ...Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.07 17:57:27 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 07 .0 1 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State. 2. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner against the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 7435 of 2024 (Afsana Tanveer Khan vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed off the writ petition filed by the appellant/writ petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal has become infructuous, as the appellant/writ petitioner has already joined the service where she was transferred. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan