MAHESH BABU SUMAN S/O SHRI KAILASH RAHI SUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17170/2025 · 2025-11-21
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47285] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17170/2025 Mahesh Babu Suman S/o Shri Kailash Rahi Suman, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 1492/10 (28) Suman Niwas Near Nehru Nagar Gate, Govind Nagar, Ajmer Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondray School, Diggi Local District Ajmer.
4. Raj Kapoor Verma, Principal At Govt. Senior Secondary School, Diggi Local, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 21/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and
further
be
pleased
to:
1. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 23.9.2025 (Annex.1 & 2) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the
[2025:RJ-JP:47285] (2 of 2) [CW-17170/2025] petitioner on the post of Principal in Govt. Senior Secondary School, Diggi Local District Ajmer. iii) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /55