- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3698-DB WP No. 101176 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 101176 OF 2025 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SHRI. SURESH Y. ADAVI, S/O. SHRI YALLAPPA ADAVI AGED ABOUT: 42 YEARS, WORKING AS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR O/O THE TAHSILDAR KALAGHATAGI TALUK, DHARWAD DISTRICT, R/AT GANESH NAGAR, KALAGHATAGI, DHARWAD DISTRICT-581204 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYKUMAR B. BAJENTRI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI-590001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHARWAD DISTRICT, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3698-DB WP No. 101176 of 2025 DHARWAD-580001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR KALAGHATAGI TALUK, DHARWAD DISTRICT-581204. 5. THE TAHSILDAR DANDELI DHARWAD DISTRICT-581325 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.12.2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE TRIBUNAL AT BELAGAVI IN APPLICATION NO.10808 AND 10809/2024 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3698-DB WP No. 101176 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) The petitioner has called in question certain orders issued by the corresponding respondents keeping him under suspension and seeking his reinstatement. The petitioner is unsuccessful in his application No.10809/2024 with the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi. However, Sri.Vijaykumar B. Bajentri, the learned counsel for the petitioner, had stated that this Court may dispose of the writ petition with appropriate directions because the order keeping the petitioner under suspension would deemed to be revoked after lapse of six [6] month as is contemplated under Rule 10 of the KCSR Rules. Today in response, Sri.Praveen K. Uppar, the learned Additional Government Advocate states that in the light of this outcome, the appropriate orders have also been issued - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3698-DB WP No. 101176 of 2025 for petitioner’s reinstatement. Therefore, the petition stands disposed of taking the submission on record. Sd/- (B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE PJ/CT:VG LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 23