On 12.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that there day in lodging the FIR. The petitioner is stated to be a member of unlawful assembly wherein Vikash @ Vikas @ Vikas Kumar, against whom the allegations of having caught hold, has been granted interim anticipatory bail vide is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of responden Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, mode, accepts notice on behalf of the complainant. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 22.11.2025. In the event of his , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that there is a delay of one the FIR. The petitioner is stated to be a member of unlawful assembly wherein one co-accused Vikash @ Vikas @ Vikas Kumar, against whom the of having caught hold, has been granted interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 11.11.2025. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. At the asking of the Court, Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, appearing through hybrid mode, accepts notice on behalf of the complainant. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the before 22.11.2025. In the event of his PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.14 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 14.01.2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Naresh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 12.11.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.14 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.