RAMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CMP-T/154/2026 · 2026-08-31
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4488 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4488 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RAMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
EX.PT-75 of 2025 31.08.2026 Present: Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
CMP-T-154 of 2026
Having perused the nature of documents intended to be placed on record in the aforesaid application, this Court is of the view that no prejudice, if any, shall be caused to either of the parties in case documents proposed to be adduced on record are taken on record, rather that would enable this Court to adjudicate the case effectively.
In view of above, present application is allowed and documents intended to be produced on record are ordered to be taken on record. Application stands disposed of.
EX.PT-75 of 2025
On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list after two weeks, as prayed for.
List on 21.09.2026.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
August 31, 2026
(Sunil)