Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4487 (UTT)

DESIGN TECH STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/91/2024 · 2025-07-09

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5897-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 9TH JULY, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/B) No. 91 OF 2024 Design Tech Structural Consultant …..…Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the instant writ petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, as the State desires to withdraw the impugned tender and re-issue the same after amending the conditions. He would also place a copy of the order dated 01.07.2025 before this Court passed by this Court in WPMB No. 92 of 2024. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous and granting liberty to the official respondents to re-do the exercise. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. 2025:UHC:5897-DB 2 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 9th July, 2025 Rathour PRAVINDR A SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779 d9e3aeb1097d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A4 0CC6179B8E010331BA695239171F906FD5C 45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2025.07.10 10:44:24 +05'30'