Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44866 (RAJ)

JAGDISH S/O SH. RAMPRATAP v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12706/2025 · 2025-10-15

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42196] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12706/2025 Jagdish S/o Sh. Rampratap, R/o Dhani Doongro Ke Paas, Nandera, P.s. Bandikui, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Bandikui, Dausa). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 15/10/2025 The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNSS”). The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.381/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa for the offence under Sections 8 and 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he is in custody since 19.09.2025, investigation as against him is complete, contraband allegedly recovered from his possession is less than commercial, he has no criminal antecedents of similar nature and prays for his release on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. [2025:RJ-JP:42196] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12706/2025] Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, nature of accusation, material available in the case diary, his length of custody, quantity of contraband recovered from him being less than commercial and absence of criminal antecedents of similar nature; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Jagdish S/o Sh. Rampratap shall be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) BNSS. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /174