1 2025:CGHC:49389 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5143 of 2025 1 - Amit Gupta S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Gupta, Aged About 39 Years R/o - Shanti Nagar Near State Bank G5r2l1r1, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Yogendra Banjare S/o Yuvraj Dutt Banjare, Aged About 33 Years R/o - Shanti Nagar Near State Bank G5r2l1r1, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Zone Commissioner, Ward No. 17 Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Tuntun Sharma R/o - Shanti Nagar Near State Bank G5r2l1r1,, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Anil Kumar Dighraskar, Aged About 74 Years R/o - 102/11 Every Shine Beverly Park, Near Mayor Bungalow, Meera Road, Thane (Maharashtra) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. K.K. Pandy, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, P.L. For Respondent-Commissioner : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 26/09/2025 1. By way of the present writ petition,the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Hon'ble Court to the Respondent No. 3 & 4 to decide upon the petitioner's representation dated 13.07.2025 pending before respondent no. 3 & 4 (ANNEXURE P-2), within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court, for the reason that Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.09.26 17:30:06 +0530 2 even after lapse of more than 12 months, till date no action has been taken by the authority that to decide the application/representation of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer and pending representation (Annexure P/2) will be considered in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondents No. 3 & 4 to consider/decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) dated 07.08.2025 and 13.07.2025 in accordance with law/rules/regulations as expeditiously as possible after giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti