MADAN MOHAN DAS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/26187/2024 · 2025-04-03
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44866 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44866 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L 17 03.04.2025 Bpg. ct.no.35
W.P.A.26187 of 2024
Madan Mohan Das Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Subhas Ch.Saha Mr. Deo Nath Sonkar. …for the petitioner.
Mr. K.J. Yusuf Ms. Munmun Ganguly. …for the State-respondents.
Mr. Rabiul Islam Ms. Rama Halder. …for the private respondent nos.9 to 11.
Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that in spite of informing the police authorities on or about 26.08.2024 in respect of debuttor property where he had been engaged as shebait, the private respondents are obstructing the petitioner from performing his right. State has submitted a report. Report reflects that the private respondents are in possession. The basis of which is the BLLRO’s report. There were allegations in the representation filed with the police authorities that the petitioner is being threatened of dire consequences including murdering him. To that
2 effect, the police authorities have drawn up proceedings under Section 126 of the BNSS. There are other cases before the Executive Magistrate filed at the behest of the parties. In view of the nature of dispute and the petitioner intends to establish his right, I am of the view that without the civil court’s interference, the right of the petitioner cannot be established. If the petitioner, is so advised, he would be at liberty to approach the jurisdictional civil court for appropriate remedies. So far as the police authorities are concerned, they would continue to keep a strict vigil and ensure that no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship between the parties. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 26187 of 2024 is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Report so submitted be kept with the record. A copy of the report be handed over to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. All parties shall act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
3 Urgent photostat certified copies of this
order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)