Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44865 (KAR)

SMT. CHITHRA NAGARAJ CHALAGERI D/O NAGARAJ v. CANARA BANK

WP/101549/2025 · 2025-02-28

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4057 WP No. 101549 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 101549 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. CHITHRA NAGARAJ CHALAGERI, D/O. NAGARAJ, AGED 30 YERAS, TIPPAKIKOPPA VILLAGE, POST: MASUR, HERIKERUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT-581210, KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V.V. RAMANA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.M. ANGADI AND SMT. RATNAMALA G.H., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. CANARA BANK, REPRESENTED BY IT’S THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICER, SRI. DANESWARI MOTORS COMPOUND, #153/V, HANNAGAL ROAD, HAVERI – 581110. 2. N.T. CHALIGERI TRADER BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. SHIVAPRAKASH S/O. BASAVARAJAPPA KANCHIKERI @ KANCHIKERE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.25, APMC YARD, RANEBENNUR – 581115, DISTRICT: HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURESH S. GUNDI, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1, BANGALORE IN S A NO.109 OF 2025 DATED 17-02-2025 PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4057 WP No. 101549 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by the honourable Debt Recovery Tribunal-1, Bangalore in S A No.109 of 2025 dated 17-02-2025 produced herewith as Annexure-F. b) Grant any other relief as this Hon’ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding costs, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. The petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy. Hence, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such alternative remedy, petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18