Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:6142
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6023 of 2024 1 - Raj Kumar Dhurve S/o Shri Ishwar Dhurve Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh. 2 - Devcharan S/o Shri Tihari Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rajendra Sahu S/o Shri Manturam Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh. 4 - Nawal Kishore S/o Shri Bhajan Verma Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh. 5 - Kamta Prasad Kurmi S/o Shri Bhagwat Kurmi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh. 6 - Raghunandan Singh Verma S/o Shri Vishram Singh Verma Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Ghontha, Gram Panchayat Mahli, District Kabirhdam Chhattisgarh.
Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Development, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh. RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.02.04 10:25:04 +0530
2 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Kabeerdham, District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Sub Division, Bodla, District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.
Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 03/02/2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submits that the final notification towards the limitation of the Panchayat has been made on 06/11/2024, whereas, the petitioner has only challenged the notification dated 09/10/2024, thus, this petition has become infructuous.
2. The same is not justified by the counsel for the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to question the final notification dated 06/11/2024, if so desires.
Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE Rahul