Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4486 (AP)

SMT DEEPATI ANANDA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1914/2024 · 2025-07-30

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010033832024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 1914/2024 Between: 1. SMT DEEPATI ANANDA KUMARI, W/O. RAJABABU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC MANDAL SAMAKHYA CLUSTER COORDINATOR(MS CC), RAMANNAPALEM, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO. 4-246/B, NALLIVARI STREET, SITHARAMPURAM, SITHARAMPURAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATION OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, (REGD. NO. 1311 OF 2000, CC.NO.67/2014), NTR-ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DRDA-YSR KRANTHI PATHAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM. 5. THE ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER, DRDA-YSRKP, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order vide Roc. No. 102/HR/Transfers/2023, dated 26.12.2023 by the 4th respondent transferring the petitioner from Ramannapalem Cluster of Mogalthur Mandal to YS Palem Cluster of Narsapuram Mandal is illegal. arbitrary, insubordination and also violation of Letter No. 95/SERP/HR/Transfers/2019, dated .06.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent apart from G.O.Ms. No.116 Finance (HR-I-Plg.SsPolicy) Dept, dated 07.06.2022 and G.O.Ms.No.122, Finance (HR.I-PlgSsPolicy) Dept, dated 16.06.2022 and also violation of Article 14, 16, 21 and 309 of Constitution of India and consequently quash/set-aside the order vide Roc. No. 102/HR/Transfers/2023, dated 26.12.2023 by the 4th respondent and to pass such other order. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to stay of all further proceedings of the order vide Roc. No. 102/HR/Transfers/2023, dated 26.12.2023 by the 4th respondent transferring the petitioner from Ramannapalem Cluster of Mogalthur Mandal to YS Palem Cluster of Narsapuram Mandal, pending disposal of the above 'writ petition and to pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI SC FOR SERP 2. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.1914 of 2024 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the order vide Roc.No.102/HR/Transfers/2023, dated 26.12.2023 by Respondent No.4 transferring the Petitioner from Ramannapalem Cluster of Mogalthur Mandal to YS Palem Cluster of Narsapuram Mandal, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Letter No.95/SERP/HR/Transfers/2019, dated .06.2022 issued by Respondent No.2 apart from G.O.Ms.No.116, Finance (HR-I-Plg. & Policy) Dept., dated 07.06.2022 and G.O.Ms.No.122, Finance (HR.I-Plg. & Policy) Dept., dated 16.06.2022. 2. The Petitioner is working as a MSCC (Coordinator) since the year 2012. While so, an order vide Roc.No.102/HR/Transfers/2023, dated 26.12.2023 was issued by Respondent No.4 transferring the Petitioner from Ramannapalem Cluster of Mogalthur Mandal to YS Palem Cluster of Narsapuram Mandal in contravention of transfer guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.116, Finance (HR-I-Plg. & Policy) Dept., dated 07.06.2022 and G.O.Ms.No.122, Finance (HR.I-Plg. & Policy) Dept., dated 16.06.2022. 4 3. At the time of hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.4 passed on the written instructions dated 25.07.2025 signed by the Project Director, DRDA, West Godavari stating that although the transfer orders were issued, the orders were not implemented and the Petitioner continues to work in the same place. Further, the Standing Counsel on instructions submits that that there is no objection for Respondent No.4 for continuance of the Petitioner in the same post. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.4, the Writ Petition is closed, by placing the written instructions dated 25.07.2025 on record. 5. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 31.07.2025 IS 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.1914 of 2024 Date: 31.07.2025 IS