[ 3504 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10312 OF 2016 Between: Executive Director BHEL - Heavy Plates & Vessels Plant, (Formerly BHPV) Visakhapatnam ...Petitloner/s AND 1. Controlling Authority under the Payment Gratuity Act 1972, & Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Visakhapatnam 2. Sri R.Venku Naidu, D.No.23-162, Srinivasa Nagar Simchalam, Visakhapatnam-530028 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased an order or a direction or a Writ more particularly one in the nature of Certiorari after calling for records from the 1 Respondent and quash the order in Gratuity Application No.85 of 2014 dated 15-2-2016. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 13002 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of order in Gratuity Application No.85 of 2014 dated 15-2-2016 during the pendency of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. S RAVINDRANATH St PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FOR CENTRE unsel for the Respondents: GADI GOVT) Counsel for the Respondents PANEI- COUNSEL) court made the following: Co : SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU (SENIOR The t APHC010664142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAWl WRIT PFTITION NO: 10312/2016 [3504] QMS >3 / THE Between; Executive Director Bhel - Heavy Plates & Vessels Plant AND Controlling Authority Under The Payment Gratuity Act 1972 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent(S); .GADl PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FOR CENTRE GOVT) 2.SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU (SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL) The Court made the following; ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) 1 When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not available on the earlier occasions i.e., 31.12.2024, 04.02.2025, 21.03.2025 and even today also. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in . Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- 2. prosecuting the case prosecution. 2 There shall be no order as to costs. As applications shall stand closed. a sequel, all pending Sd/- A VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI S RAVINDRANATH 2. One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN GOVT) Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU COUNSEL) Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies Ksr (gsg) Advocate [OPUC] KUMAR (SC FOR CENTRL (SENIOR PANEL HIGH COURT DATED: 28/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.10312 of 2016 I r: 25 JUN es 5' ?• fc- DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS i' i