KOMAL SHARMA D/O LAXMAN PRASAD v. SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
CW/15272/2024 · 2025-11-24
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44851 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44851 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48499] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15272/2024 Komal Sharma D/o Laxman Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Dayalpura, Post Tasai, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar 321605 (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Lalgarh Palace, Near Unnamed Road, Samta Nagar, Bikaner
334001.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 24/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i) Issue appropriate order or direction to the respondents, to call entire record of the matter for the perusal of the Hon’ble Court. ii) To revise the result as per marks obtained by the petitioner. iii) To give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Teacher Level-II (Sanskrit). iv) to reserve on post of Teacher Level-II (Sanskrit) till the disposal of this writ petition.
[2025:RJ-JP:48499] (2 of 3) [CW-15272/2024]
2. Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, whereas Mr. Nalin G. Narain accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. Office is directed to reflect their names as counsel for respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 26.05.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.31/2024 titled as Deepika Kunwar Chundawat & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid
judgment.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is
disposed of in light of Deepika Kunwar Chundawat (supra) passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If
[2025:RJ-JP:48499] (3 of 3) [CW-15272/2024] the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /261