ZTZZ.t IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUFl AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 473 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.03.2025 in W.P. No. 6079 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between: Dara Ananda Kumari, W/o. Dara Ashok, aged about 31 years, R/o. D. No. 1-1-31, Chillaragolla palem, 9th ward, Bapatia Town and District. ...APPELLANT^ AND Kochera Sanjeevahima, W/o. Late Raju, aged about 59 years, R/o. Murthy Rakshna Nagar, Bapatia Town, Bapatia District (FP Shop No. 0789030). 1. ...RESPONDENT (WRIT PETITION)" 2. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. The Joint Collector and Additional District Magistrate, Bapatia (CS), Bapatia District. 3. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer and Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bapatia (CS), Bapatia District. The Tahsildar, Civil Supplies (CS), Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. ...RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS 1 to 4)— 5. i . 3 OF 2025 ^ ' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances , f^^',stated ir> the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to suspend the impugned order dated 27.03.2025 passed by the tedfned single Judge in W.P. No. 6079 of 2025, pending disposal of the above writ appeal. ^ Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SARANU PHANI TEJA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES" The Court made the following: JUDGMENT \ s d A--*' Sl.No.7 , APHC010196932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 473 of 2025 ...Appellant Dara Ananda Kumari Vs. ...Respondents Kochera Sanjeevamma and others ********** Sri Saranu Phani Teja Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. Advocate for appellant Advocate for respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 28th April 2025 PC : The present Writ Appeal has been preferred against the interim order dated 27.03.2025 passed in W.P.No.6079 of 2025. 2. By virtue of the said order, direction has been issued to the official respondents to supply essential commodities to the fair price shop No.0789030 of the petitioner in the writ petition. The direction was issued primarily on account of the failure of the official respondents to report instructions in terms of the order passed by the learned single Judge. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that even when the 3. appellant was a necessary party before the learned single Judge, she was not 2 incorporated as such in the writ petition and that even when the appellant had been appointed as a fair price shop dealer on a temporary basis and was supplying 420 card holders the requisite ration, the temporary arrangement in favour of the appellant could not have been disrupted without affording opportunity of being heard to the appellant. an 4. On a perusal of the order impugned, it can be seen that the petitioner had questioned the suspension of the fair price shop license of the petitioner as also the appointment of the appellant as a temporary dealer has been contrary to the rules and regulations applicable in the instant case. It appears that in the absence of an appropriate response and instructions reported by the official respondents, interim direction has been issued. While the appellant thus seems to have been appointed as a fair price shop dealer temporary basis, it would not, in any manner, take away the right of the petitioner as the existing fair price shop dealer to question the order of suspension on grounds which are available to her and mentioned in the writ petition. on 5. We are of the opinion that in case the appellant has any right, she can approach the learned single Judge with a prayer seeking impleadment and for vacation of the interim order, if so advised. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. 3 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Saranu Phani Teja, Advocate [OPUC]^ One CC to Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, Advocate [OPUC] Two CC’s to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUT] Three CD Copies. 2. 3. 4. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:28/04/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.473 of 2025 OF ANOf^ g 12 MAY 2025 m DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS