[2025:RJ-JP:50958] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16844/2025 Pinki W/o Chhote Lal Saini D/o Bihari Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Ram Vihar Colony Bansur, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli Behror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bansur, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. 4. Tehsildar, Bansur, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 17/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 15.02.2021 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1155/2021 (Sunita Kumari V. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondents does not dispute this fact. 3. Relevant portion of Sunita Kumari’ case (supra) reads as under:- “Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the petitioners to make an application before the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate, who shall carry out the necessary enquiry as required under the law and if petitioners are found entitled for EWS certificate, [2025:RJ-JP:50958] (2 of 2) [CW-16844/2025] the same may be issued within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the application. The Competent Authority is required to look into the entitlement of the candidates for the purpose of issuing certificate in EWS category and this certificate is not in relation to any caste or category. This Court also makes it clear that the observations of this Court in respect of grant of EWS certificate, will not have any bearing on entitlement of the petitioners to get benefit except that issuance of certificate will be in pursuance of circular issued by the State Government.” 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of in the same terms as in the case of Sunita Kumari (supra). 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /38