1 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: CRL.R.C. No. 1305 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 01 20.11.2025 SS, J Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by an order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Prathipadu, Kakinada (East Godavari District) in CC SR No.4033/2022 in Crime No.87 of 2023, the instant criminal revision has been filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is aggrieved against the impugned order wherein the learned Magistrate has intends to proceed only against Accused No.1 to 3, by relieving Accused No.4 to 9. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pertains to investigation by the police, thus, Magistrate cannot proceed with the criminal case in a SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE piecemeal way. It is further argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Magistrate has not followed the observations of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021(19) SCC 401. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and also considering the entire proceedings as well as impugned order, I find justification to entertain the instant Criminal Revision. Accordingly, Criminal Revision be admitted. Notify State for instructions. Let, the matter be appeared in the list before the appropriate bench having determined within one week. ____ SS,J KS1