IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1337 OF 2015 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor/Respondent Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully deliberately flouting the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No. 26710 of 2014 dated 11- 09-2014 and pass Between: Smt K.Mahalakshmi, W/o Lakshmaiah, Aged 48 years. Fair Price Shop ealer, Shop No.59, China Agraharam village, Piduguralla Mandal Guntur District. Act 1971 No.4 under ...PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER AND Mr.E.Murali, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gurajala, Guntur District. ...CONTEMNOR/RESPONDENT No.4 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. PAPAIAH PEDDAKULA Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following ORDER : 7 • APHC010362502015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1337/2015 Between: 1.SMT.K.MAHALAKSHMI, W/0 LAKSHMAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS. FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER. SHOP NO.59. CHINA AGRAHARAM VILLAGE. PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.MR E MURALI. The Revenue Divisional Officer. Gurajala. Guntur District. •{ ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor/Respondent No.4 under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. for willfully deliberately flouting the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.26710 of 2014 dated 11-09-2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PAPAIAH PEDDAKULA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1 .GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: /’ 2 :: ORDER :• Heard Sri Papaiah Peddakula, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The above \ contempt case is filed implementation of the order dated complaining about the 11.09.2014 in W.P.No.26710 of 2014. non- 3. The Writ Petition ' not providing the essential petitioner for September 2014. The said writ petition was disposed of portion of the order reads as follows; was filed to declare the action of the S'" respondent in as well as kerosene oil to the commodities, 4. on 11.09.2014. The operative Since It is stated that petitioner’s authorization as fair oh IS valid and subsisting, the respondents petitioner. If really, the petitioner —. price shop dealer are bound to supply stocks to the applied for leave, she would not approach this Court by filing the respondents 4 and 5 present writ petition. As such, the are directed to supply stocks to the price shop as long as petitioner’s authorization i petitioner’s fair is valid and subsisting With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. There shali be no order as to costs. As a sequei thereto, misceilaneous petitions pending shall stand closed.” , if any. 5. A counter-affidavit the counter-affidavit, it respondents issued was filed in the above contempt case. In para-4 of was contended that in pursuance of the above order, a direction to the Tahsildar, Piduguralla to supply the essential commodities to the petitioner vide proceedings Rc.No.1570/2014-B, accordingly, the essential commodities to the petitioner till April 2015. Thereafter, a dated 30.09.2014. and were supplied case under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 registered on 25.04.2015 after following the procedure. No reply was filed denying the fact of the commodities in pursuance of the order. supply of essential \ 3 6. Thus, as seen from the averments in the counter-affidavit, the order has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, \ 1. Mr.E.Murali, The Revenue Divisional Officer, 2. One CC to Sri. Papaiah Peddakula, Advocate Gurajala. Guntur District. [OPUC] 3. TwoCCsto GP for Civil Supplies (AP) .High Court Of Andhra [OUT] Pradesh. 4. Three CD Copies vna 4 HIGH COURT DATED;05/03/2025 ORDER CC.No.1337 of 2015 ^OF ANOH^ 1‘ JUL 2025 ?? O OC- rr ! O ■ o ■V H CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE