M/S MAHALAXMI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18119/2025 · 2025-11-25
Sandeep Taneja
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44837 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44837 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47729] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18119/2025
1. M/s Mahalaxmi Construction Company, W.no. 1, Dhani Badwala, Virat Nagar, Jaipur, Through Proprietor Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Bhanwar Lal Saini, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Dhani Badwala Ki, Ward No. 1, Virat Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registra- tion No. Rj 52 Gb 2232, Rj 52 Gb 1332 And Rj 52 Gb 3132
2. Banshi Dhar Choudhary S/o Nanchhi Lal Choudhary, R/o Talab Kee Dhani, Tehsil Amer, Bilochi, District Jaipur, Ra- jasthan Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 52 Ga 1030
3. Kanhaiya Lal Jat S/o Jiwan Ram, R/o Mannasala Ki Dhani, Bilochi, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 41 Ga 4260
4. Patel Builders, Sona Vihar, Delhi Road, Infront Of Js Four- wheel, Alwar, Through Proprietor Ramphal Mp S/o Sunder Lal, R/o Mp Patel Farm House, Malakheda, Peela Dhawa, Post Dhakpuri, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 02 Gc 6465, Rj 02 Gb 9300 And Rj 02 Gb 8283
5. Sobhag Meena S/o Shambhu Lal Ji, R/o Village Nathawa, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 20 Gc 0095 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.
2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.
3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur.
4. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kot- putli Behror (Rajasthan).
5. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
[2025:RJ-JP:47729] (2 of 4) [CW-18119/2025]
6. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
7. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
8. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan).
9. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Dausa, District Dausa.
10. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Kota, District Kota.
11. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Tonk, District Tonk.
12. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Bhilwara, District Bhilwara.
13. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Shahpura, District Bhilwara.
14. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kekri, District Kekri.
15. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Bundi, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aatish Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra K. Takar, Adv for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 25/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors) decided on 20.11.2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the State does not refute the fact that similar controversy has been decided.
[2025:RJ-JP:47729] (3 of 4) [CW-18119/2025]
3. The co-ordinate Bench has decided the writ petition & opera- tive portion of the same is as follows:-
“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall re- port to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.
7. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.
8. It is made clear that during the period of considera- tion of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as regis- tered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.
9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.
10. In the light of the same, the present writ petition
stands
disposed
of
with
the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”
[2025:RJ-JP:47729] (4 of 4) [CW-18119/2025]
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /45