[2025:RJ-JP:47150] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13847/2025 Ombati Chaudhary Wife Of Rajat Chaudhary, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village Basokar, Tehsil Kumher, District Deeg. ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Applicant Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13848/2025 Jyoti Chaudhary D/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Basokar, Tehsil Kumher, District Deeg. ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rohan Agarwal For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Yash Takhar through VC HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 466/2025 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 316(5), 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. By the way of present applications, anticipatory bail of two applicants, namely Ombati Chaudhary and Jyoti Chaudhary, have been filed before this Court. Howsoever, at the outset, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that recently a petition [2025:RJ-JP:47150] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13847/2025] under Section 528 BNSS filed on the same facts and circumstances has been dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that that there is a cognizance taken against one of the applicant, namely Jyoti Chaudhary, by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) at Shimla, and charges to the tune of approximately Rs.5 crores have been leveled against the applicant, being involved in a scam with Punjab National Bank (PNB). It is further submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that there is a concealment regarding the fact that there are multiple FIRs registered against one of the applicant, namely Jyoti Chaudhary. 4. In light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and upon perusal of the record at hand, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the complainant, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant applications. 5. Accordingly, instant bail applications are dismissed. 6. A copy of present order be placed in the connected application. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/216-217